What is a Systematic Review - Pubrica


Pubrica

Uploaded on May 30, 2020

Category Education

• A systematic review is a secondary research as it requires a careful analysis of the quality, quantity, and consistency of research findings. • Systematic reviews formulate research questions that are specifically targeted and designed to provide a complete summary of the issue based on evidence. • The methodology used in systematic reviews is specific and precise, which intends to minimize bias by increasing the reliability of the drawn conclusion. Full information: https://bit.ly/2ZNTlPU Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/ Why pubrica? When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts. Contact us : Web: https://pubrica.com/ Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/ Email: [email protected] WhatsApp : +91 9884350006 United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299

Category Education

Comments

                     

What is a Systematic Review - Pubrica

WHAT IS A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email: [email protected] Today's Discussion Outlin In brief e Introduction What makes an Excellent Systematic Review Different types of Reviews Differences between Systematic and Literature Reviews Conclusion In Brief A systematic review is a secondary research as it requires a careful analysis of the quality, quantity, and consistency of research findings. Sy stematic reviews formulate research questions that are specifically targeted and designed to provide a complete summary of the issue based on evidence. The methodology used in systematic reviews is specific and precise, which intends to minimize bias by increasing the reliability of the drawn conclusion. Introductio n A systematic review is a process of identifying comprehensive studies for a research specific question through evaluating the methods of the study, summarizing the results, presenting key findings and identifying reasons for produced results across the study. In a systematic review, the compiled information tends to be explicit and more transparent using reproducible methods. The produced results of a systematic review can be summarized either in text or graphic form, and it depends upon the nature of the primary data. The PRISMA, provides a set of regulations on how to report a systematic review. What makes an Excellent Systematic Review? A good systematic review will include, A focused question Inclusion/exclusion criteria Search strategy Study selection Assess the quality of studies Synthesize study results Analysis and limitations Contd .. 1. FOCUSED QUESTION a systematic review is a research method used to address a specific research question and formulating a well-constructed research question is essential for a successful review. 2. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA It studies the writers included or excluded and the reason. 3. SEARCH STRATEGY The reviewer must explain the methods used for finding relevant studies which include published and unpublished clinical trial reports, online database search, as well as approaching experts in finding unpublished data. Contd.. 4. STUDY SELECTION Need to identify suitable study criteria and collect relevant data for conducting a systematic review. 5. ASSESS THE QUALITY OF STUDIES It helps in identifying the risk of bias in secondary research. 6. SYNTHESIZE STUDY RESULTS Upon similarity on the included data, the author must determine the effectiveness of an intervention using meta-analysis. 7. ANALYSIS AND LIMITATIONS The review should discuss the addressed area of study, the findings, and how the review results change the existing limitations. Different types of Reviews: There are many types of reviews addressing questions of effectiveness, questions about the prevalence of diagnostic accuracy, and prognosis. Different types of reviews include, Literature Review Meta-analysis Rapid review Scoping review S ystematic review Systematized review Umbrella review Differences between Systematic and Literature Reviews Systematic Review Literature Review Mainly focused on one question. It describes an overview and not based on a single question. It follows peer review protocol or plan. It has no protocol. Study-specific objectives are identified. No such objectives will be identified. A systematic search will be Search strategy will not be mentioned. conducted. Clear and explicit. Not described Research question specific information Extracting relevant information is not extraction. specific to a single question Conclusio n In summary, a systematic review is a search of all sources of evidence for relevant studies or on research question specific study. Predetermined reproducible criteria to screen for eligibility and relevance assessment of titles and the abstracts will be followed. Each study will then be assessed in terms of methodological quality, and finally, the evidence is synthesized. Contact Us UNITED KINGDOM +44-1143520021 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL [email protected] om