Now you can get guarantee for success in your final IT exam. Realexamdumps has appeared as the biggest source of help for IT candidates. You can download 70-767 dumps from this site and learn about all the corners of the field. Our veterans of the field are taking charge of this preparatory process which is so short and sure. We don’t indulge our students in irrelevant descriptions. Only those concepts are included in 70-767 questions and answers that are considered ingredients of the basic concepts. There is a team of teachers who will lead you to the right direction. Now is the time to download free demo version of this short guide. Demo version will demonstrate a complete picture about the validity of 70-767 dumps material. Online Practice Test will also be helpful to repeat your learnt concepts. For more info:https://www.realexamdumps.com/microsoft/70-767-practice-test.html
Get Valid 70-767 Question And Answer For Microsoft Exam With Free Experts Tips
Microsoft 70-767 Dumps PDF I m p l e m e n ting a Data Warehouse using SQL For More Info: https://www.realexamdumps.com/microsoft/70-767-practice-test.html Question: 1 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Microsoft Azure SQL Data Warehouse instance that must be available six months a day for reporting. You need to pause the compute resources when the instance is not being used. Solution: You use SQL Server Configuration Manager. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: To pause a SQL Data Warehouse database, use any of these individual methods. Pause compute with Azure portal Pause compute with PowerShell Pause compute with REST APIs References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-manage-compute- overview Question: 2 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Microsoft Azure SQL Data Warehouse instance that must be available six months a day for reporting. You need to pause the compute resources when the instance is not being used. Solution: You use the Azure portal. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: A Explanation: To pause a SQL Data Warehouse database, use any of these individual methods. Pause compute with Azure portal Pause compute with PowerShell Pause compute with REST APIs Note: To pause a database: 1. Open the Azure portal and open your database. Notice that the Status is Online. 2. To suspend compute and memory resources, click Pause, and then a confirmation message appears. Click yes to confirm or no to cancel. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-manage-compute- overview https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-manage-compute- portal#pause-compute-bk Question: 3 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Microsoft Azure SQL Data Warehouse instance that must be available six months a day for reporting. You need to pause the compute resources when the instance is not being used. Solution: You use SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS). Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: To pause a SQL Data Warehouse database, use any of these individual methods. Pause compute with Azure portal Pause compute with PowerShell Pause compute with REST APIs References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-manage-compute- overview Question: 4 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a data warehouse that stores information about products, sales, and orders for a manufacturing company. The instance contains a database that has two tables named SalesOrderHeader and SalesOrderDetail. SalesOrderHeader has 500,000 rows and SalesOrderDetail has 3,000,000 rows. Users report performance degradation when they run the following stored procedure: You need to optimize performance. Solution: You run the following Transact-SQL statement: Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: 100 out of 500,000 rows is a too small sample size. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-tables- statistics Question: 5 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a data warehouse that stores information about products, sales, and orders for a manufacturing company. The instance contains a database that has two tables named SalesOrderHeader and SalesOrderDetail. SalesOrderHeader has 500,000 rows and SalesOrderDetail has 3,000,000 rows. Users report performance degradation when they run the following stored procedure: You need to optimize performance. Solution: You run the following Transact-SQL statement: Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: Microsoft recommend against specifying 0 PERCENT or 0 ROWS in a CREATE STATISTICS..WITH SAMPLE statement. When 0 PERCENT or ROWS is specified, the statistics object is created but does not contain statistics data. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/statements/create-statistics-transact-sql Question: 6 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a data warehouse that stores information about products, sales, and orders for a manufacturing company. The instance contains a database that has two tables named SalesOrderHeader and SalesOrderDetail. SalesOrderHeader has 500,000 rows and SalesOrderDetail has 3,000,000 rows. Users report performance degradation when they run the following stored procedure: You need to optimize performance. Solution: You run the following Transact-SQL statement: Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: A Explanation: You can specify the sample size as a percent. A 5% statistics sample size would be helpful. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-tables- statistics Question: 7 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have the following line-of-business solutions: ERP system Online WebStore Partner extranet One or more Microsoft SQL Server instances support each solution. Each solution has its own product catalog. You have an additional server that hosts SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) and a data warehouse. You populate the data warehouse with data from each of the line-of-business solutions. The data warehouse does not store primary key values from the individual source tables. The database for each solution has a table named Products that stored product information. The Products table in each database uses a separate and unique key for product records. Each table shares a column named ReferenceNr between the databases. This column is used to create queries that involve more than once solution. You need to load data from the individual solutions into the data warehouse nightly. The following requirements must be met: If a change is made to the ReferenceNr column in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True and create a new row in the Products table. If a row is deleted in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True in the data warehouse. Solution: Perform the following actions: Enable the Change Tracking for the Product table in the source databases. Query the CHANGETABLE function from the sources for the updated rows. Set the IsDisabled column to True for the listed rows that have the old ReferenceNr value. Create a new row in the data warehouse Products table with the new ReferenceNr value. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: We must check for deleted rows, not just updates rows. References: https://www.timmitchell.net/post/2016/01/18/getting-started-with-change-tracking-in-sql- server/ Question: 8 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have the following line-of-business solutions: ERP system Online WebStore Partner extranet One or more Microsoft SQL Server instances support each solution. Each solution has its own product catalog. You have an additional server that hosts SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) and a data warehouse. You populate the data warehouse with data from each of the line-of-business solutions. The data warehouse does not store primary key values from the individual source tables. The database for each solution has a table named Products that stored product information. The Products table in each database uses a separate and unique key for product records. Each table shares a column named ReferenceNr between the databases. This column is used to create queries that involve more than once solution. You need to load data from the individual solutions into the data warehouse nightly. The following requirements must be met: If a change is made to the ReferenceNr column in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True and create a new row in the Products table. If a row is deleted in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True in the data warehouse. Solution: Perform the following actions: Enable the Change Tracking feature for the Products table in the three source databases. Query the CHANGETABLE function from the sources for the deleted rows. Set the IsDIsabled column to True on the data warehouse Products table for the listed rows. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: We must check for updated rows, not just deleted rows. References: https://www.timmitchell.net/post/2016/01/18/getting-started-with-change-tracking-in-sql- server/ Question: 9 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have the following line-of-business solutions: If a change is made to the ReferenceNr column in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True and create a new row in the Products table. If a row is deleted in any of the sources, set the value of IsDisabled to True in the data warehouse. One or more Microsoft SQL Server instances support each solution. Each solution has its own product catalog. You have an additional server that hosts SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) and a data warehouse. You populate the data warehouse with data from each of the line-of-business solutions. The data warehouse does not store primary key values from the individual source tables. The database for each solution has a table named Products that stored product information. The Products table in each database uses a separate and unique key for product records. Each table shares a column named ReferenceNr between the databases. This column is used to create queries that involve more than once solution. You need to load data from the individual solutions into the data warehouse nightly. The following requirements must be met: Enable the Change Tracking for the Product table in the source databases. Query the cdc.fn_cdc_get_all_changes_capture_dbo_products function from the sources for updated rows. Set the IsDisabled column to True for rows with the old ReferenceNr value. Create a new row in the data warehouse Products table with the new ReferenceNr value. Solution: Perform the following actions: Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: We must also handle the deleted rows, not just the updated rows. References: https://solutioncenter.apexsql.com/enable-use-sql-server-change-data-capture/ Question: 10 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You are developing a Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) projects. The project consists of several packages that load data warehouse tables. You need to extend the control flow design for each package to use the following control flow while minimizing development efforts and maintenance: Solution: You add the control flow to a script task. You add an instance of the script task to the storage account in Microsoft Azure. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: A package consists of a control flow and, optionally, one or more data flows. You create the control flow in a package by using the Control Flow tab in SSIS Designer. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/integration-services/control-flow/control-flow Question: 11 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You are developing a Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) projects. The project consists of several packages that load data warehouse tables. You need to extend the control flow design for each package to use the following control flow while minimizing development efforts and maintenance: Solution: You add the control flow to an ASP.NET assembly. You add a script task that references this assembly to each data warehouse load package. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: B Explanation: A package consists of a control flow and, optionally, one or more data flows. You create the control flow in a package by using the Control Flow tab in SSIS Designer. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/integration-services/control-flow/control-flow Question: 12 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You are developing a Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) projects. The project consists of several packages that load data warehouse tables. You need to extend the control flow design for each package to use the following control flow while minimizing development efforts and maintenance: Solution: You add the control flow to a control flow package part. You add an instance of the control flow package part to each data warehouse load package. Does the solution meet the goal? A. Yes B. No Answer: A Explanation: A package consists of a control flow and, optionally, one or more data flows. You create the control flow in a package by using the Control Flow tab in SSIS Designer. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/integration-services/control-flow/control-flow Question: 13 DRAG DROP Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience, the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series. You have a Microsoft SQL Server data warehouse instance that supports several client applications. The data warehouse includes the following tables: Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, Dimension.Date, Fact.Ticket, and Fact.Order. The Dimension.SalesTerritory and Dimension.Customer tables are frequently updated. The Fact.Order table is optimized for weekly reporting, but the company wants to change it daily. The Fact.Order table is loaded by using an ETL process. Indexes have been added to the table over time, but the presence of these indexes slows data loading. All data in the data warehouse is stored on a shared SAN. All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. The data warehouse has grown and the cost of storage has increased. Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. You have the following requirements: Implement table partitioning to improve the manageability of the data warehouse and to avoid the need to repopulate all transactional data each night. Use a partitioning strategy that is as granular as possible. Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. Partition the Fact.Ticket table and retain seven years of data. At the end of each month, the partition structure must apply a sliding window strategy to ensure that a new partition is available for the upcoming month, and that the oldest month of data is archived and removed. Optimize data loading for the Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, and Dimension.Date tables. Incrementally load all tables in the database and ensure that all incremental changes are processed. Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. Ensure that historical data remains online and available for querying. Reduce ongoing storage costs while maintaining query performance for current data. You are not permitted to make changes to the client applications. You need to implement partitioning for the Fact.Ticket table. Which three actions should you perform in sequence? To answer, drag the appropriate actions to the correct locations. Each action may be used once, more than once or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content. NOTE: More than one combination of answer choices is correct. You will receive credit for any of the correct combinations you select. Answer: Explanation: From scenario: - Partition the Fact.Ticket table and retain seven years of data. At the end of each month, the partition structure must apply a sliding window strategy to ensure that a new partition is available for the upcoming month, and that the oldest month of data is archived and removed. The detailed steps for the recurring partition maintenance tasks are: References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/tables/manage-retention-of- historical-data-in-system-versioned-temporal-tables Question: 14 DRAG DROP Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience, the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series. You have a Microsoft SQL Server data warehouse instance that supports several client applications. The data warehouse includes the following tables: Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, Dimension.Date, Fact.Ticket, and Fact.Order. The Dimension.SalesTerritory and Dimension.Customer tables are frequently updated. The Fact.Order table is optimized for weekly reporting, but the company wants to change it daily. The Fact.Order table is loaded by using an ETL process. Indexes have been added to the table over time, but the presence of these indexes slows data loading. All data in the data warehouse is stored on a shared SAN. All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. The data warehouse has grown and the cost of storage has increased. Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. You have the following requirements: Implement table partitioning to improve the manageability of the data warehouse and to avoid the need to repopulate all transactional data each night. Use a partitioning strategy that is as granular as possible. - Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. - Partition the Fact.Ticket table and retain seven years of data. At the end of each month, the partition structure must apply a sliding window strategy to ensure that a new partition is available for the upcoming month, and that the oldest month of data is archived and removed. - Optimize data loading for the Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, and Dimension.Date tables. - Incrementally load all tables in the database and ensure that all incremental changes are processed. - Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. - Ensure that historical data remains online and available for querying. - Reduce ongoing storage costs while maintaining query performance for current data. You are not permitted to make changes to the client applications. You need to configure the Fact.Order table. Which three actions should you perform in sequence? To answer, move the appropriate actions from the list of actions to the answer area and arrange them in the correct order. Answer: Explanation: From scenario: Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. Step 1: Create a partition function. Using CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION is the first step in creating a partitioned table or index. Step 2: Create a partition scheme based on the partition function. To migrate SQL Server partition definitions to SQL Data Warehouse simply: Step 3: Execute an ALTER TABLE command to specify the partition function. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-tables- partition Question: 15 DRAG DROP Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience, the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series. You have a Microsoft SQL Server data warehouse instance that supports several client applications. The data warehouse includes the following tables: Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, Dimension.Date, Fact.Ticket, and Fact.Order. The Dimension.SalesTerritory and Dimension.Customer tables are frequently updated. The Fact.Order table is optimized for weekly reporting, but the company wants to change it daily. The Fact.Order table is loaded by using an ETL process. Indexes have been added to the table over time, but the presence of these indexes slows data loading. All data in the data warehouse is stored on a shared SAN. All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. The data warehouse has grown and the cost of storage has increased. Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. You have the following requirements: Implement table partitioning to improve the manageability of the data warehouse and to avoid the need to repopulate all transactional data each night. Use a partitioning strategy that is as granular as possible. Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. Partition the Fact.Ticket table and retain seven years of data. At the end of each month, the partition structure must apply a sliding window strategy to ensure that a new partition is available for the upcoming month, and that the oldest month of data is archived and removed. Optimize data loading for the Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, and Dimension.Date tables. Incrementally load all tables in the database and ensure that all incremental changes are processed. Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. Ensure that historical data remains online and available for querying. Reduce ongoing storage costs while maintaining query performance for current data. You are not permitted to make changes to the client applications. You need to optimize data loading for the Dimension.Customer table. Which three Transact-SQL segments should you use to develop the solution? To answer, move the appropriate Transact-SQL segments from the list of Transact-SQL segments to the answer area and arrange them in the correct order. NOTE: You will not need all of the Transact-SQL segments. Answer: Explanation: Step 1: USE DB1 From Scenario: All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. Step 2: EXEC sys.sp_cdc_enable_db Before you can enable a table for change data capture, the database must be enabled. To enable the database, use the sys.sp_cdc_enable_db stored procedure. sys.sp_cdc_enable_db has no parameters. Step 3: EXEC sys.sp_cdc_enable_table @source schema = N 'schema' etc. Sys.sp_cdc_enable_table enables change data capture for the specified source table in the current database. Partial syntax: sys.sp_cdc_enable_table [ @source_schema = ] 'source_schema', [ @source_name = ] 'source_name' , [,[ @capture_instance = ] 'capture_instance' ] [,[ @supports_net_changes = ] supports_net_changes ] Etc. References: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/system-stored-procedures/sys- sp-cdc-enable-table-transact-sql https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/system-stored-procedures/sys-sp-cdc- enable-db-transact-sql Question: 16 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience, the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series. You have a Microsoft SQL Server data warehouse instance that supports several client applications. The data warehouse includes the following tables: Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, Dimension.Date, Fact.Ticket, and Fact.Order. The Dimension.SalesTerritory and Dimension.Customer tables are frequently updated. The Fact.Order table is optimized for weekly reporting, but the company wants to change it daily. The Fact.Order table is loaded by using an ETL process. Indexes have been added to the table over time, but the presence of these indexes slows data loading. All data in the data warehouse is stored on a shared SAN. All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. The data warehouse has grown and the cost of storage has increased. Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. You have the following requirements: Implement table partitioning to improve the manageability of the data warehouse and to avoid the need to repopulate all transactional data each night. Use a partitioning strategy that is as granular as possible. Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. Partition the Fact.Ticket table and retain seven years of data. At the end of each month, the partition structure must apply a sliding window strategy to ensure that a new partition is available for the upcoming month, and that the oldest month of data is archived and removed. Optimize data loading for the Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, and Dimension.Date tables. Incrementally load all tables in the database and ensure that all incremental changes are processed. Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. Ensure that historical data remains online and available for querying. Reduce ongoing storage costs while maintaining query performance for current data. You are not permitted to make changes to the client applications. You need to implement the data partitioning strategy. How should you partition the Fact.Order table? A. Create 17,520 partitions. B. Use a granularity of two days. C. Create 2,557 partitions. D. Create 730 partitions. Answer: C Explanation: We create on partition for each day. 7 years times 365 days is 2,555. Make that 2,557 to provide for leap years. From scenario: Partition the Fact.Order table and retain a total of seven years of data. Maximize the performance during the data loading process for the Fact.Order partition. Question: 17 Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience, the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series. You have a Microsoft SQL Server data warehouse instance that supports several client applications. The data warehouse includes the following tables: Dimension.SalesTerritory, Dimension.Customer, Dimension.Date, Fact.Ticket, and Fact.Order. The Dimension.SalesTerritory and Dimension.Customer tables are frequently updated. The Fact.Order table is optimized for weekly reporting, but the company wants to change it daily. The Fact.Order table is loaded by using an ETL process. Indexes have been added to the table over time, but the presence of these indexes slows data loading. All data in the data warehouse is stored on a shared SAN. All tables are in a database named DB1. You have a second database named DB2 that contains copies of production data for a development environment. The data warehouse has grown and the cost of storage has increased. Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. You have the following requirements: You are not permitted to make changes to the client applications. You need to optimize the storage for the data warehouse. What change should you make? A. Partition the Fact.Order table, and move historical data to new filegroups on lower-cost storage. B. Create new tables on lower-cost storage, move the historical data to the new tables, and then shrink the database. C. Remove the historical data from the database to leave available space for new data. D. Move historical data to new tables on lower-cost storage. Answer: A Explanation: Create the load staging table in the same filegroup as the partition you are loading. Create the unload staging table in the same filegroup as the partition you are deleteing. From scenario: Data older than one year is accessed infrequently and is considered historical. References: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sqlcat/2013/09/16/top-10-best-practices-for-building-a- large-scale-relational-data-warehouse/
Comments