Uploaded on Oct 12, 2019
DFG Champions Oct 19
AWD ppt promotional presentation September 2019
Adaptations without delay Presented by…… Adaptations without delay : purpose •Ensure a more responsive service to those needing adaptations •Reduce demand on occupational therapy services •Improve efficiency in response to uplifts in funding •A rationale for key stakeholders on when an occupational therapist is not needed •Make best use of the expertise of occupational therapists in complex situations •Being applicable in all four UK nations Intended audience Services concerned with providing advice and information to disabled and older people and their families : - Occupational therapy services in health, social care and housing - Housing providers and housing associations - Home improvement agencies, care and repair - Handy persons services - Training providers - Voluntary organisations - Members of the public Role for different audiences • Housing providers • Local Authority housing services, home improvement and care and repair agencies • Occupational therapists • Health and social care commissioners • Retailers, product suppliers and independent contractors • Members of the public Adaptations without delay : contents • A fresh approach to respond to growing demand • Stakeholder consultation: process and findings • Describing adaptations based on complexity rather than type and cost • A framework to support a proportionate response • Tools on work force and operational considerations • The value of occupational therapy in complex situations • Demonstrating how other staff can carry out simple assessments • Innovations in practice from around the UK • Sources of design guidance UK Wide Stakeholder consultation : methodology Survey of front line practitioners Desktop Review (800 + respondents) Legislation Policy and Practice • Occupational therapists • Staff working in Home Improvements Agency • Staff working Housing Associations • Technicians Stakeholder interviews • Trusted Assessors •Occupational therapy managers •Home Improvement Agencies Focus Groups •Care and Repair Manchester, London, Cardiff, Belfast, Glasgow •Housing providers and Housing Associations Steering Group: meetings and reviews •Royal College of Occupational Therapists Foundations, Care @ Repair, RCOT Specialist Section representatives Housing, CIH, RCOT Stakeholder consultation : key questions Stakeholder consultation : key findings • Common themes in policy and legislation that place an emphasis on prevention • Waiting for a social care assessment is contributing to delays • That integrated approach to assessment , design and installation can deliver better person centred outcomes • The most common major adaptations are showers, stair lifts and ramps where the situation is simple and straightforward • Typically the need has been defined by the type or cost of the adaptation rather than the complexity of the situation • Significant numbers of people who are self-funding need information and advice A new way to describe adaptations : based on the complexity of the situation • Simple or complex (not minor Vs major) • A person centred approach • Provide a proportionate response • Prioritise prevention • Values occupational therapy as a complex intervention A new way to describe adaptations : based on the complexity of the situation Dimensions of complexity •The person, their priorities and needs •The nature of the activities the person is having difficulty performing •Environmental barriers to independence •The types of solutions required Developing the Adaptations without delay framework: Key Learning •Providing a more proportionate response •Establishing the right skill mix •A guide for the retail market on when a targeted or specialist response is needed •Helping members of the public understand the type of service they might need Work force and operational considerations – and level of complexity UNIVERSAL TARGETED SPECIALIST Natureof WorkforceSkills Operational complexity Considerations Universal Targeted Specialist Service Delivery Examples • Training –DLF (England) – Housing Solutions Change programme i(Scotland) • Agreed levels of responsibility – example from RBG • Communication Tools – example from Northern Ireland Housing Executive • One stop shops – example from Borders Care and Repair • Integrated teams – example from Lightbulb Project in Leicesteshire • Strategic Forums - HAC (England) , AHG (Scotland) , HASG (Wales) JASG (NI) Sources of design guidance • Guidance on space and layout for home adaptations • Organisations that provide technical expertise • Organisations that specialise in the needs of people with sensory and cognitive impairments The final message : How the guide can help to reduce delays • Avoid service design that is based on type and cost of adaptation • Avoid misinterpretation of legislation and the role of occupational therapists • An understanding of the type of situation where an occupational therapist does not need to be involved • To make more effective use of occupational therapists where the situation is complex • To enable redesign of services that prioritise person-centred and preventative outcomes Thank you! Royal College of Occupational Therapists Housing LIN 106-114 Borough High Street, C/o PRP, the Ideas Store, 10 Lindsey Street, London SE1 1LB Clerkenwell, London EC1A 9HP email: [email protected] website: www.rcot.co.uk email: [email protected] website: www.housinglin.org.uk Twitter: @theRCOT Twitter: @HousingLIN; @HousingLINews
Comments