Uploaded on Oct 12, 2019
DFG Champions Oct 19
DFG Roadshow 19
Conflicts & Friendships A Relationship Perspective DFG Roadshow Oct 2019 National Body for Home Improvement Agencies Improving Delivery of the Disabled Facilities Grant DFG is Process Heavy OT Assessor OT responsible for establishing clinical need. GO responsible for protecting the public purse LA HIA CW responsible HIA for advocating on Facilitator GObehalf of the client Enforcer Split Legal responsibilities Housing authorities have the mandatory duty for Cost-Benefit the DFG Social Care has duties to older & disabled Conflicts people & disabled children. Health has a duty to respond all at the point of need Public Housing Health Health Planning Social DFG Care Costs and benefits split: Capital costs - Central Govt and 3rd Housing Authorities sector Revenue costs - Housing Services and budgets split: Authorities and Social Care DFG, Community Equipment, Sensory Impairment, Overall benefits - Health and Social Assistive Tech, Repairs, Wheelchairs. Care Overly complex for customers & professionals Commissioner Hierarchical, transactional -Contractor leadership Tensions Essentially Parent/Child relationship Referee and fixer of disputes Multiple contracts to monitor Output not outcome drive Process costs/micro management stifles change & innovation Risk are unfairly distributed Quality VS Cost trade-offs. OT HIA LA CustomersGO Public Health HousingHealth Social DFG Customers Care Costs of conflict 1700 FTEs costing £76.5M (15% or 17% with man costs) Local Government Ombudsman activities 120-150 statements/year 1% but 50% higher than £1 spent on other council services 10 times more likely per household (0.3% vs 0.04%) Significant levels of work related stress High in Health, Social care & local government 1/3 of all ill health at work Leading to average 31 day sickness Sclerotic processes Let’s Pull Shared Commitment to Together! Integrated Care & Support (2013) Care Act Duty to Collaborate Better Care Fund (2014) National Memorandum of Understanding on Health & Housing (2015 & 2018) Collaborative HIA (2016) A new way to engage? Collaborative Co-produced Person-centred An Provides a vehicle to share Alliance risks, responsibilities & opportunities Provides a way of working based on alignment around outcomes and commitment to principles & behaviours Not a legal entity as Alliance participants retain their own identity & internal controls. Alliance Contract Traditional contract Alliance Alliance Governance Arrangements Contract Risk-sharingRewards Structure Performance Alliance Contract One contract, one between all performance framework parties Contract sets out agreed outcomes and relationships Strong Relationships & Trust Aligned objectives, shared risks P Shared Responsibility P1 2 P3 P4 P5 drives improvement Success judged on Alliance Participants performance overall Decisions are made against principles Collective responsibility for all risks Act according to ‘Best for Alliance Service’ values & Decisions Behaviours Alliance Principles Alliance Unanimous Appoint on decisions on best person all key basis issues Open Book ‘ No Fault, Accounting & No Blame ‘ Transparency Culture Alignment of Goals: Organisational Will achievement of Alliance Goals lead Alignment to achievement of our own Goals? Alignment of Drivers: Will our own strategic objectives be met by being a member of the Alliance? Alignment of Commitment: Are we prepared to make collective decisions & play our part in implementing them? Alignment of Governance: Does the decision making, policy setting & assurance role of the Alliance fit with our own governance? Integrated Governance Commissioner Commissioner as Owner Sets mandate, outcomes, risk-strategy. Focus on system & Behavioural leadership Alliance Leadership Team (ALT) Alliance Leadership Team Senior members (including commissioner) with authority to commit on behalf of their Alliance Management Team (AMT) organisations; One Leadership Forum to led by Alliance Manager replace contract monitoring Wider Integrated Team Alliance Management Team Key people with subject expertise from each of the participating organisations P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Teams Teams Teams Teams Teams Alliance Manager Runs the alliance (‘go to’ person or CEO) 14 Collaboration is…. Making decisions together Implementing those decisions Being jointly accountable the results Drives Collaboration & Innovation Alliance Values Different Perspectives & diversity of provision Contracting Democratic and equal: Everyone has a say, decision making is shared Single Risk Sharing Contract Integrated governance; principle based decision making Performance Framework focused on whole system outcomes Financial risk share through gainshare & pain-share mechanism Alliance Contracting The Targeted Prevention Alliance Stockport A little closer to 6 Community & Housing Home organisations The Lambeth Living Well Collaborative 2 Charities, Foundations Trust & ASC Conclusions Risk (and opportunity) share not risk allocation “we thought we The collective dynamic of several were good at interdependent features is unique partnerships. Now to alliancing we are working in an alliance we Collaborative leadership skills realise we hadn’t needed – from commissioners especially really collaborated before” Build relationships strong enough to have hard conversations Alliance Logic Chain Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impacts Switch Alliance Alliance Greater Fewer conflicts, Resource strategy Principles, number of complaints & from contract Governance Values & people stress. management structure Behaviour helped to Greater to service Alliance Organisational stay well at Systemic improvement members Alignment home. Resilience Alliance Financial Reduced Better agreement framework Financial Communities Risks Interested in Exploring Alliancing? [email protected] Dr Linda Hutchinson LH Alliances: http://lhalliances.org.uk/
Comments